COS-STAB provides the stability, verification, and quality-assurance layer for Collapsing-Structure (COS) dynamics. It does not introduce a new fundamental dynamics or an independent stability principle, but fixes minimal numerical and operational verification requirements for COS-QF, COS-QD, COS-QSF, COS-SM, and related COS-NUM implementations. The module focuses on three stability-critical issues: preservation of the geometric and physical sectors, control of drift under time stepping and projection, and protection of the Wilson-kernel spectral gap in chiral Ginsparg-Wilson/overlap constructions on dynamically updated graphs. It defines projectors, soft stabilizers, optional numerical projection or rejection safeguards, runtime diagnostics, conditional rTS2 drift checks for bounded quasi-local observables, and an admissibility-based conditional gap criterion. Compliance is evaluated from mandatory run artifacts, especially runₘeta. json and metrics. jsonl. The document defines Stage 1 sanity checks and Stage 2 publication-level gates based on logged diagnostics, seed quantiles, confidence-based upper bounds, and step-size scaling checks where applicable. COS-STAB therefore serves as the common stability and QA reference specification for controlled COS numerical claims, while not replacing full dynamical, continuum-limit, or phenomenological closure.
Attila Görhöny (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: