The subject of the research is the public-legal consequences of including individuals in the digital infrastructure of state governance, formed under the conditions of strengthening digital sovereignty. The analysis focuses not on the preservation of individual data arrays, but on the changing legal conditions for the exercise of subjective rights when using digital identification, interagency data exchange, biometric authentication, digital profiles, and algorithmically mediated procedures. The research focus is on situations where adverse effects for citizens occur without direct prohibition, formal administrative denial, or obvious violations of personal data regulations. An important aspect is the dependency of access to public procedures on the accuracy of digital recognition of the individual, the consistency of registry entries, and the stability of inter-system data processing. This approach allows for considering the informational security of individuals as a problem of the stability of legal status in the state digital environment, where legally significant results can be formed before the emergence of a externally expressed authoritative decision. Formal-legal, systemic, institutional, and doctrinal methods were used, enabling the comparison of regulatory regimes of digital identification, data processing, and administrative impact. The scientific novelty consists in substantiating the position that digital sovereignty changes the public-legal construct of information security for individuals: the state infrastructure becomes not just an object of protection but also a condition for access, assessment, and preliminary modeling of an individual's behavior. Identification, behavioral, and predictive modes of digital impact were distinguished, differing by the moment of risk occurrence, the degree of procedural visibility, and the possibility of subsequent challenge. It was concluded that existing guarantees aimed at data protection, the individual's consent, and verification of formalized administrative decisions do not cover situations where limiting effects arise before the emergence of an external act or are distributed among several technological links. The object of legal protection should be recognized not only as the confidentiality of information but also as the predictability of the legal status of citizens within the digital public administration system. The practical significance of the results lies in the possibility of using the proposed typology to assess digital access, rectify erroneous digital representation, and establish limits for predictive assessment in administrative procedures, including cases of interagency exchange and automated distribution of administrative attention to citizens in public governance.
Renat Valer'evich Zanikov (Fri,) studied this question.