This paper provides the rigorous engineering specification for the Ternary Logic (TL) Smart Contract Execution Layer, defining deterministic rules for all state transitions within the constitutional triadic model: Proceed (+1), Epistemic Hold (0), and Refuse (1). The Epistemic Hold is specified as the fail-closed default state, returned by TLEvidenceVault. getTransactionState () for any transaction whose evidence has not yet been archived, making uncertainty constitutionally visible rather than operationally invisible. The specification defines three forbidden transitions: Epistemic Hold to Epistemic Hold re-resolution, direct Refuse to Proceed, and direct Proceed to Refuse. Resolution of the Epistemic Hold to either Proceed or Refuse requires Stewardship Custodian quorum attestation of nine of eleven members. The Dual-Lane Latency Architecture is specified with a 2ms WCET hard ceiling at the 99. 99th percentile for the Inference Lane and a 300ms hard ceiling with 50ms jitter maximum for the Governance Lane. The No Log = No Action invariant is enforced across five independent layers culminating in the on-chain terminal gate at TLLedgerCore. registerPermissionToken, which reverts NLNAViolation if the logHash is not provably included in an anchored Merkle root. The Smart Contract Treasury fee architecture is defined as governance parameters labeled Nomination 2026, establishing permissionTokenFee and archiveEvidenceFee as Tri-Cameral Joint-Approval variables rather than hardcoded constants. The Epistemic Hold carries no fee by constitutional design. The specification includes the Triple-Entry Accounting model extending traditional double-entry with a third cryptographically secured entry recording justification and context, Role-Based Access Control implementation patterns, the complete use case library spanning financial services, sustainable finance, supply chain, and decentralized governance, and a full Glossary of Terms establishing the canonical V2. 0 vocabulary of the TL framework.
Lev Goukassian (Tue,) studied this question.