Precise stellar ages are fundamental to Galactic archaeology. However, obtaining reliable age estimates and uncertainties for field stars has been a long-standing challenge. We test the fidelity of ages from recent catalogs of giants and subgiants using wide binaries, whose components formed at the same time and thus should have consistent inferred ages. We find that subgiant ages based on spectroscopic metallicities from Xiang & Rix (2022) are generally consistent within their reported uncertainties, implying that fractional uncertainties of 5 − 10 % are realistically achievable. In contrast, we find that published photometric subgiant ages underestimate true uncertainties by factors of 2 − 3 . Spectroscopic age estimates for red giant and red clump stars also show reliable uncertainties, but are generally less precise ( 25 − 30 % ). These results demonstrate that accurate chemical abundance measurements are essential for precise subgiant ages and establish wide binaries as a powerful, model-independent benchmark for calibrating stellar age measurements in the era of large spectroscopic surveys.
Shariat et al. (2026) studied this question.