12146 Background: Chemotherapy-induced constipation (CIC) is a common yet frequently overlooked supportive care issue, currently, there is still a lack of efficient and affordable methods. This trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of orally administered mannitol injection versus lactulose in cancer patients with CIC. Methods: An open-label, multicenter, prospective RCT (ChiCTR2200056847) planned to enroll 114 adults. Participants were randomized 1:1 to oral mannitol 50 mL post-meal 3–5×/day or lactulose 30 mL once daily for 3 days. Primary endpoint: time to first spontaneous defecation (TFSD). Secondary endpoints included weekly complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs), Bristol Stool Form Scale, PAC-QOL, and CTCAE v5.0 adverse events (AEs). Interim analysis was performed when 112 participants had completed the 7-day assessment; database was locked on 30 January 2026. Results: A nationwide survey (14 provinces, n=1,174) revealed significantly higher constipation rates in stage IV cancer patients (p<0.05), and found that the managements vary in effectiveness. In an RCT interim analysis (112 patients), baseline demographics were balanced between mannitol (n=56) and lactulose (n=56) groups. Median time to first defecation was significantly shorter in mannitol group with 5.5 hours (IQR 3.0-15.8) than in lactulose with 16.0 hours (IQR 5.3-27.5) (p=0.003)(Fig. 1). Secondary outcomes were comparable: weekly mCSBMs (3.0 vs. 3.0, p=0.083); Bristol Scale improvement ≥1 category (60.7% vs. 58.9%, p=0.847); and PAC-QOL score (-26 vs. -18 points, p=0.105). Both treatments were safe, with only mild, transient adverse events at similar rates (3.6% vs. 5.4%, p=0.647)(Table 1). Conclusions: Survey data confirm under-recognition of CIC and therapeutic gaps for advanced-stage patients. In this interim analysis, oral mannitol significantly shorten TFSD than lactulose, with mild adverse events, which is a rapid-onset, low-cost option for CIC management. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2200056847. TFSD, weekly CSBMs, adverse events, PAC-QOL. Outcome Mannitol (n=56) Lactulose (n=56) p-value TFSD (median, IQR) 5.5 (3.0–15.8) hrs 16.0 (5.3–27.5) hrs 0.003 Weekly CSBMs (median, IQR) 3.0 (3.0–4.0) 3.0 (2.0–3.0) 0.083 Stool form improvement (≥1 Bristol) 34 (60.7%) 33 (58.9%) 0.847 PAC-QOL change (Δ, mean) -26 (18.3–40.5) -18 (12.5-37.5) 0.105 Any AE (%) 2 (3.6%) 3 (5.4%) 0.647
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
C Liu
First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College
Yanru Liu
First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College
Mingxiang Gao
First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Sichuan University
West China Hospital of Sichuan University
First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192dd1fab5b468c4416ba5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.12146