What does this research mean for the field?

Mobile stroke units significantly reduce the time to diagnosis and the administration of goal-directed blood pressure treatment for patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage compared to conventional emergency medical services. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

This research evaluates how mobile stroke units affect diagnosis and treatment times in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

May 29, 2026

Mobile Stroke Units Enable Hyperacute Interventions for Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Key Points

This research evaluates how mobile stroke units affect diagnosis and treatment times in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.
Retrospective analysis of patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage triaged by mobile stroke units or emergency medical services from January 2018 to December 2022.
Two tertiary institutions were involved: Cleveland Clinic and Stony Brook University.
Primary outcomes assessed included diagnosis time by computed tomography and administration of antihypertensives.
Mobile stroke units reduced time to diagnosis by 28% (β =0.72 [95% CI, 0.62–0.82]; P <0.001).
Antihypertensives were given to 78% of MSU patients compared to those in EMS, where administration was delayed until emergency department arrival, facilitating a 54% reduction in administration time (β =0.46 [95% CI, 0.36–0.59]; P <0.001).
87% of MSU patients achieved blood pressure goals within one hour, compared to 60% in EMS (P <0.001).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile stroke units (MSUs) aim to expedite acute stroke management when compared with conventional emergency medical services (EMS). Despite the growing body of evidence surrounding MSUs and acute ischemic stroke, experience with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in MSUs has been lacking. We aimed to evaluate the impact of MSU transportation, compared with EMS, on times to diagnosis and goal-directed treatment in patients with ICH. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with acute ICH triaged by MSU or EMS from January 2018 to December 2022 was performed at 2 tertiary institutions, the Cleveland Clinic (OH) and Stony Brook University (NY). In the EMS cohort, only patients seen between 08:00 and 20:00, corresponding to the operating hours of MSU, were included. Primary outcomes included diagnosis by computed tomography, administration of antihypertensives, and time to goal systolic blood pressure (<160 mm Hg). Analyses included descriptive statistics and multivariable regression modeling of log-transformed time metrics, adjusting for important patient demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Among 540 patients screened with ICH, after removing those with exclusion criteria, 218 MSU patients were compared with 192 EMS patients. Cohorts had similar baseline demographics, majority male (53.7% MSU versus 49.5% EMS), mean age 67±14 and 68±16, respectively. MSUs reduced time to diagnosis by 28% ( β =0.72 95% CI, 0.62–0.82; P <0.001). Antihypertensives were administered to 78% of MSU patients, whereas not routinely given to EMS-transported patients until emergency department arrival. This facilitated a time reduction of 54% in the administration time of antihypertensive medications in MSU compared with EMS transported patients ( β , 0.46 95% CI, 0.36–0.59; P <0.001). With 87% of MSU patients achieving blood pressure goal within 1 hour from last known well, compared with 60% in EMS ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MSUs provide faster diagnosis and medical treatment for patients with acute ICH than patients transported by conventional EMS.

Read Full Paperexternally

Mark Helpful

Bookmark

Relay

View Full Paper