The DHDNA Paradigm maps individual cognition onto twelve quasi-stable dimensions, producing a per-subject signature whose stability across deliberation episodes was the central empirical claim. Field application of that instrument over a thirty-six-hour window of acute affective load produced an observation the original framework cannot accommodate: cognition under load did not shift only along twelve dimensions; it resolved into four quasi-independent positions operating in coordination, with a separate meta-layer confirming the absence of fusion. This paper introduces the Inner Matrix — a plural-cognition reframe in which the twelve DHDNA dimensions are retained as the expressive surface of a four-position council whose coordination dynamics, not whose static profile, predict behavior under load. The four positions — sensor, stabilizer, framer, actuator — are coordination nodes on a 3-simplex Δ³. The meta-layer, the Witness, is reported as a separate scalar integrity index. The framework is falsifiable on three pre-registered tests: simplex shift under affective trigger above baseline drift, coherence advantage of position-tagged training over flat training in a sovereign reference model, and Akaike-information-criterion parsimony of the four-position decomposition against three or five on a held-out corpus. A companion Part II is reserved for the LoRA-EMMA reference implementation. Patent Pending — U.S. Provisional Application No. 64/073,917, filed May 25, 2026.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ashraf Kahoush
Health Strat (Kenya)
Health Strat (Kenya)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ashraf Kahoush (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e79fab5b468c4417a59 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20406531
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: