11166 Background: Immunotherapy (IT) has transformed cancer treatment and is often better tolerated than chemotherapy; however, immune-related pulmonary adverse events (Pulm-AE) have emerged as clinically significant and potentially treatment-limiting toxicities that may impact morbidity, treatment continuity, and survival. Real-world comparative data on Pulm-AE risk remain limited. We evaluated the incidence, cumulative risk, severity, and clinical outcomes of Pulm-AEs in patients receiving IT versus non-IT systemic therapies. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 5,556 adult cancer patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic between 2010–2022. Included cancers were bladder (stage II–IIIA n = 476; IV n = 158), endometrial IV (n = 157), esophageal/gastric (II–III n = 797; IV n = 590), head IV n = 223), metastatic melanoma (n = 45), and lung cancers: non-squamous NSCLC (IIIB n = 206; IV n = 1,609), squamous NSCLC (IIIB n = 182; IV n = 366), and SCLC IIIB–IV (n = 623). Patients receiving IT (± chemotherapy or radiation) were compared with non-IT regimens and followed from treatment initiation to Pulm-AE, death, or last encounter. Pulm-AEs included pneumonitis, pleural effusion ± pleuritis, and interstitial lung disease. Data were collected on demographics, CTCAE grade, timing, management, and outcomes. Incidence rates per 100 person-years (py) were estimated using Poisson regression, cumulative incidence (CIR) using Kaplan–Meier methods, and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) using time-dependent Cox models. Results: Of 5,556 patients, 2,133 (38%) received IT, including 1,291 (60%) as first-line therapy; 99.9% of IT exposure was ICI. The cohort was 38% female, 87% White, with a median age of 66 years. Over a median follow up of 14 months (CI: 6-35), 127 Pulm-AEs occurred, including 51 among first-line IT recipients. Pulm-AE incidence was higher with IT than non-IT (0.2 vs 0.06 per 100 py; P < 0.05), driven primarily by pneumonitis (0.16 vs 0.04 per 100 py; P < 0.05). At 24 months, CIR for Pulm-AEs was 5.5% with first-line IT versus 2.0% without (HR 3.50, P < 0.001); pneumonitis CIR was 4.3% versus 1.3% (HR 5.21, P < 0.001). Among pneumonitis cases, 86% were CTCAE grade 2–4, 81% required steroid therapy, and 28% resulted in permanent IT discontinuation, frequently necessitating long-term immunosuppression. Other Pulm-AEs in the IT & non-IT groups were pleural effusion (n = 10, 24), pleuritis without effusion (n = 0, 2), and interstitial lung disease (n = 0, 2). Conclusions: Receipt of IT was associated with a significantly increased risk of Pulm-AEs, primarily clinically significant pneumonitis. These toxicities were common (~7% by 24 months), frequently severe, and often led to irreversible damage and treatment cessation, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring, early recognition, multidisciplinary management, and prompt intervention to minimize morbidity.
Yepes et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: