Effluent collected from the effluent dumping site and other contaminated sites in and around the industry at different time periods indicated significant difference in chemical composition and mercury concentration. Hence, it was planned to collect the effluent from the effluent soaking pond where the discharged effluent is stocked for aerial drying and soaking. The effluent of the Chlor-alkali industry contained 0.38mg of Hg l -1 which is significantly high when compared to the values prescribed by Pollution Control Boards. The toxicity study indicated that the effluent is deadly toxic. The maximum allowable concentration (MAC) for 30d experiment was deduced and the long term experiments were conducted at MAC value. The exposed fishes appeared lethargic after introduction of the effluent. Initial symptoms like erratic swimming, ataxia, in appetence were marked in the effluent exposed fishes. Initial higher ventilation rate followed by depression was due to initial over excitation followed by impact leading to stress impact was clear in exposed fishes. Control fishes remained clinically healthy through the experimental period. Depression in BSI and LSI values in effluent exposed fishes compared to control fish values were noted. The residual mercury accumulation was significant and residual mercury enrichment increased with the increase in exposure period indicating a positive correlation. It was also noted that all the tested values were probably linked to residual mercury. It seems the body enrichment of mercury in different organs impacted the physiological parameters of the effluent exposed fishes. The exposed fishes did not recover when transferred to effluent free medium. The exposed fish could not recover during recovery period indicating permanent damage caused to the vital organs by the mercury contained effluent. Little variations during recovery period were not statistically significant and it was not possible to attribute this insignificant recovery in the parameters to be an asset for stress physiology.
Priyadarsan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: