Abstract Two of the most consequential debates in political philosophy have proceeded for decades without recognising a shared structural flaw. The debate about when civil disobedience is legitimate and the debate about whether protective rights produce genuine equality for the weakest members of a community both mistake a nominal framework — procedural compliance rules in the first case, legal permission in the second — for the actual causal variable that determines whether the acts in question are genuinely what they claim to be. That variable is the virtue-state of the agent: the integrated exercise of practical wisdom and justice. This article formalises that variable and derives two linked results. First, the Injustice Threshold Function (ITF) specifies the conditions under which institutional capture is sufficient to dissolve procedural authority and generate a moral obligation — not merely a permission — to transgress. Second, the Equalisation Proximity Function (EPF) specifies the conditions under which a community’s protective architecture achieves genuine equalisation for its weakest members beyond legal permission. The two results share a common structure, and their integration constitutes the Unified Virtue-Legitimacy Framework (UVLF). We prove that the standard acceptance-of-punishment criterion is internally incoherent (Theorem T1), derive the obligation threshold as an indicator function on objective structural indices, specify the generalised EPF with a saturation-bounded capacity term and a collective security coupling coefficient, and demonstrate cross-domain structural invariance in five unlike domains including AI alignment. We design a pre-registerable empirical test using Mahalanobis-matched state-pair comparisons and Structural Equation Modelling. The UVLF resolves the anomalies of both traditions and opens a new observational programme. Keywords: civil disobedience, virtue ethics, Tutela Libertatis, legitimate transgression, political obligation, equalisation proximity function, injustice threshold function, spoudaios confirmation, cascading virtue-atrophy, philosophy of virtues, Alguilas-AI, Virtuous Transgression, Guns
José Caetano de Mattos (Thu,) studied this question.