Correction: Attentional capture effects are modulated by the number of concurrently maintained search goals

A correction refers to a change to their article that the author wishes to publish after publication. The publication of this article is subject to Frontiers' editorial approval.Instructions:• Please read through all the templates before choosing • Pick the most relevant text template(s) from the following page and delete all others.• Edit the text as necessary, ensuring that the original incorrect text is included for the record, please see the below. • Please do not use any extra formatting when editing the templates, and only modify the red text unless absolutely necessary • Submit to Frontiers following the instructions on this page.When the original text contained incorrect information, to preserve the scientific record, please include that text when editing the below templates. For example:There was a mistake in the Funding statement, an incorrect number was used.The correct number is "2015C03Bd051.". The publisher apologizes for this mistake.The original version of this article has been updated.In the published article, there was a mistake in the Funding statement. The funding statement for the Key Development Project of the Department of Science and Technology was displayed as "2015CBd051". The correct statement is "Key Development Project of Department of Science and Technology (2015C03Bd051).''Adding/removing text state the error that was made There were two incorrect statistics in the original publication. In the original, p = 0.27 was listed twice for two statistics, whose true values were actually p = 0.019 and p = 0.014. The original sentence read: For SC < TA, t(29) = 2.48, p = 0.27, d = 0.132. For TA < DC, t(29) = 2.63, p = 0.27, d = 0.210. For SC < DA, t(29) = 4.35, p < 0.001, d = 0.342.Name of Section, subsection Name of Sub-section if there is one, Paragraph Number A correction has been made to the section 3.3 Reaction Time, paragraph 2: "insert corrected paragraph" "Mirroring the accuracy analyses, with reaction time (in milliseconds) as the dependent variable, we conducted a 3 × 3 ANOVA using lag 2 data with the factors trial type (TA, SC, and DC) and set size (2,4,16) for trials that were correctly responded to. There was a main effect of trial type, with fastest responses to SC trials (M = 368, SE = 23), followed by TA trials (M = 386, SE = 17), and then DC trials (M = 414, SD = 23), F(2,58) = 11.63, p < 0.001, adj. n2p = 0.286. Post-hoc tests demonstrate that the difference between each condition is significant. For SC < TA, t(29) = 2.48, p = 0.019, d = 0.132. For TA < DC, t(29) = 2.63, p = 0.014, d = 0.210. For SC < DA, t(29) = 4.35, p < 0.001, d = 0.342. Faster responses to SC trials compared to TA and DC trials indicates evidence of attentional set enhancement. There was also a main effect of set size, with faster RTs to set size 16 (M = 342, SE = 23), followed by set size 4 (M = 373, SE = 23), followed by set size 2 (M = 453, SE = 22), F(1,29) = 15.02, p < 0.001, adj. n2p = 0.341. Posthoc tests confirm that the difference between set size 2 and set size 4 is significant t(29) = 3.72, p = 0.002, d = 0.59, but the difference between set size 4 and set size 16 is not, t(29) = 1.59, p = 0.121, d = 0.232 (see Figure 6)."The original version of this article has been updated.for a reason not seen here, please contact the journal's editorial office.