Abstract Over the past decade, a substantial portion of the literature on AI ethics has focused on issues such as transparency, accountability, algorithmic fairness, privacy, safety, and risk mitigation (UNESCO, 2021; OECD, 2019). While these approaches are essential for managing technological risks, they appear insufficient for addressing the growing human, social, and civilizational complexities of contemporary societies. This paper introduces the concept of Transcendent AI Ethics and proposes a new horizon for ethical inquiry in artificial intelligence. In this perspective, ethics is not merely a mechanism for constraining technology; rather, it becomes a framework for the responsible, facilitative, and proactive guidance of intelligent technologies toward strengthening human dignity, fostering shared understanding, preserving cultural diversity, enhancing collective cooperation, and increasing societal capacity to address complex global challenges. The paper argues that contemporary humanity is facing a crisis of complexity, a condition in which the scale and interconnectedness of global challenges exceed the capacity of traditional decision-making structures. Under such circumstances, AI ethics must move beyond the paradigm of technological control and evolve into a discipline dedicated to guiding technology toward the manifestation of human capacities. Within this framework, artificial intelligence is defined neither as a substitute for human beings nor as an autonomous source of value judgment, but rather as a companion for manifestation a system capable of assisting individuals and communities in discovering latent capacities, developing shared understanding, facilitating cooperation, and improving decision-making processes, while preserving human authority over values and ethical priorities. The paper further introduces the conceptual model of Human Dignity, Need, Priority, and Perceptual Context as one of the foundational pillars of Transcendent AI Ethics and demonstrates that no meaningful ethical framework for artificial intelligence can be established without simultaneously considering these four dimensions. Finally, the paper concludes that adopting this perspective can transform AI ethics from a framework focused primarily on controlling technology into a framework for the responsible utilization of technology in the service of collective wisdom, cultural diversity, civilizational cooperation, and enhanced societal capacity to confront complex and multilayered global challenges.
غلامرضا رضائی (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: