Socioeconomic deprivation was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (39.6% vs 24.8%; HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.37-3.10, p=0.001).
Cohort (n=648)
No
Does socioeconomic deprivation increase adverse clinical outcomes in adult patients receiving peritoneal dialysis?
Socioeconomic deprivation is independently associated with a twofold increased risk of all-cause mortality among patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.
Hazard Ratio: 2.08 (95% CI 1.37–3.1)
Absolute Event Rate: 39.6% vs 24.8%
p-value: p=0.001
Background Socioeconomic deprivation is an established determinant of adverse health outcomes. However, UK-specific data examining its impact on peritoneal dialysis (PD) outcomes remains generally unknown. This study evaluated associations between socioeconomic deprivation and clinical outcomes among patients receiving PD at a single UK center over a 10-year period. Methods This retrospective observational study included 648 adult patients who underwent PD catheter insertion between January 2015 and December 2024. Socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), with study cohorts categorized into quintiles from the least to the most deprived. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, transfer to hemodialysis (HD), and kidney transplantation. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular events and PD-related infections, that is, peritonitis and exit-site infections. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to match for age, ethnicity, and smoking history to compare between the most deprived quintiles (MDQ) (i.e., quintiles 1 and 2) and the least deprived quintiles (LDQ) (i.e., quintiles 4 and 5). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between socioeconomic deprivation and outcomes. Results Of the 648 patients included, 41.7% resided in quintile 1. Patients in LDQ were significantly younger (median = 54 IQR 42–67 vs. 64 51–74 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to belong to ethnic minority backgrounds (24% vs. 7.7%, p < 0.001) compared to those in MDQ. Across all quintiles, no significant associations were observed between deprivation and all-cause mortality, transfer to HD, or kidney transplantation. In the propensity-matched cohort (n = 298), all-cause mortality was significantly higher among patients from MDQ compared to the LDQ (39.6% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.006). Social deprivation was noted to be an independent risk factor associated with all-cause mortality in the matched cohort (adjusted HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.37–3.10, p = 0.001). No significant associations were identified in relation to cardiovascular events, transfer to HD, kidney transplantation, or PD-related infections. Conclusion In a propensity score-matched cohort from this single-center study, socioeconomic deprivation was independently associated with increased mortality among patients receiving PD. No significant associations were observed between socioeconomic deprivation with transfer to HD or kidney transplantation and PD-related infection complications.
Mamidi et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in Peritoneal dialysis (n=648). Socioeconomic deprivation (most deprived quintiles) vs. Least deprived quintiles was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.37-3.10, p=0.001). Socioeconomic deprivation was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (39.6% vs 24.8%; HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.37-3.10, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: