Accurate vineyard yield estimation is essential for harvest planning, resource allocation, and economic decision-making, particularly under conditions of high spatial variability. Traditional sampling-based methods are labor-intensive, destructive, and prone to error, especially in high-productivity free-canopy systems. This study developed and evaluated predictive models for commercial irrigated vineyards of Carménère and Chardonnay in Chile’s Maule Region across two growing seasons (2023–2025). Structural yield components, physiological measurements, and UAV-derived multispectral indices (NDVI, GNDVI, NDRE) were collected from georeferenced sampling grids. Modeling approaches included linear regression, stepwise selection, and machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Multilayer Perceptron). Validation results showed that cluster number was the primary driver of yield variability, explaining up to 40% of variation. Incorporating physiological and spectral variables improved accuracy, with the best models (least squares and MLP) achieving R2 values up to 0.66 and reducing errors to 12–15%. Spatial yield maps reproduced intra-vineyard variability patterns, demonstrating that integrating plant-level and canopy-level data substantially enhances yield prediction. These findings provide a robust framework for precision viticulture applications.
Acevedo-Opazo et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: