The UN Security Council (UNSC) is the body endowed with the primary responsibility and powers to undertake collective action in order to “save future generations from the scourge of war”. Yet, the powers invested in the UNSC came with a caveat – each of the five permanent members (P5) of the Security Council would have a veto power regarding any proposed decision in this body concerning international peace and security. This paper deals with the UNSC veto – its history, justification, and the implications of its existence and (ab)use by the P5. In the first part of this paper, the voting in the UNSC, as regulated in Article 27 of the UN Charter, is explained and interpreted. Afterwards, the veto powers of the P5 are detailed, focusing on those veto powers that are not explicitly mentioned in the UN Charter (the socalled: “double veto”; “meta veto”; “behind the scene veto”, “reverse veto” and “indirect veto”), before delving into the history behind the creation of the Council and the veto in particular. Lastly, the paper turns to the idea of the “unreasonable veto”, or the (ab)use of the P5’s veto powers.
Ljupcho Stojkovski (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: