This study investigates the durability of timber buildings through a systematic literature review and a service life assessment of two representative building components. The review focused on degradation mechanisms, reasons for demolition, reference service life values, and strategies for extending service life. The deterioration of timber was found to be primarily driven by biological, physical, and mechanical processes, with moisture as a critical factor. Although degradation mechanisms are thoroughly documented, evidence concerning the physical lifespan of timber buildings remains scarce. Most demolitions are due to obsolescence and inadequate maintenance rather than structural failure. Reference service life values are frequently derived from expert judgment and often lack transparent boundary conditions. Nevertheless, factor-based service life prediction models offer a framework for evaluating structural components. When applied to a reference building, the method yielded estimated service lives of 100 years for an interior LVL beech column and 81 years for an exterior wall stud. These findings align with observed lifespans reported in demolition studies. More robust empirical data on demolition ages and refined reference values under standardized conditions are needed. Such improvements would enhance the accuracy of service life prediction models, support more realistic environmental assessments, and strengthen the role of timber as a sustainable construction material.
Später et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: