This article examines the Nyaya school of Indian philosophy — one of the six classical Darshanas — as a systematic framework for critical thinking and valid reasoning that predates Aristotelian logic and offers tools of enduring practical relevance. Drawing on Gautama's Nyaya Sutras (approximately 2nd century BCE) and their subsequent development by Vatsyayana, Uddyotakara, and Gangesa, five specific tools of the Nyaya tradition are identified and examined: Pramana (the four valid sources of knowledge — perception, inference, comparison, and testimony); Anumana (the five-membered syllogism, compared to Aristotle's three-membered version); Tarka (hypothetical reasoning and reductio ad absurdum); Vada (the rules of honest philosophical debate); and Nirnaya (the definitive conclusion reached through systematic inquiry). The article argues that Nyaya's epistemological framework — which systematically identifies both valid and invalid forms of reasoning — represents one of the most rigorous intellectual traditions available for developing critical thinking capacity. The convergence between Nyaya's categories of invalid inference (Hetvabhasa) and modern cognitive bias research is documented.
Narayan Rout (Thu,) studied this question.