Approximately 30% of all human cancers are driven by mutations in RAS genes, KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS, resulting in the constitutive activation of RAS proteins and stimulation of MAPK/AKT signaling. Non-mutant, i.e., wild-type (WT) RAS can also become activated through mechanisms such as gene amplification or excessive stimulation by mutated or overexpressed receptor tyrosine kinases (e.g., EGFR), thereby promoting cancer progression. Mutant or activated RAS contributes to multiple hallmarks of cancer, including unchecked cellular proliferation, reprogrammed cellular metabolism, immunosuppression, and metastasis. Hence, RAS is of immense clinical importance, with hundreds of laboratories studying various aspects of RAS biology or developing RAS inhibitors. There is perhaps no greater unmet medical need in oncology than the need for a broadly efficacious but safe inhibitor of mutant and activated RAS. Mutant-specific KRAS G12C inhibitors have shown promising therapeutic efficacy, leading to FDA approval of sotorasib and adagrasib, although their use is limited to patients with the relatively rare G12C KRAS mutation. Mutant-specific KRAS inhibitors are also susceptible to adaptive resistance, in part, due to secondary RAS mutations, and compensatory signaling from WT RAS isozymes. A pan-RAS inhibitor capable of blocking all RAS isozymes, regardless of the underlying mutation, offers the potential for broader efficacy and capacity to avert resistance. While just a few years ago, pan-RAS inhibitors were predicted to be severely toxic or even fatal, the apparent safety profile of RMC-6236 (daraxonrasib), a pan-RAS inhibitor currently in clinical trials, suggests otherwise. Indeed, pan-RAS inhibitors are now considered by many in the RAS field to be the most promising class in development. In this review, we summarize the evolution and current status of pan-RAS and pan-KRAS inhibitors in preclinical and clinical development and highlight emerging human-relevant tumor models that are advancing preclinical evaluation.
Ramesh et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: