Violence remains a central criminal justice and public health concern, yet policy discussions often narrow analysis to crime, punishment, and individual behavior. A broader framework is needed. Manuscripts in the special issue examine violence as a product of upstream political choices, institutional design, fiscal priorities, fragmented governance, unequal exposure to injury, access to health care, government services availability, and political representation. Across varied settings, authors show how local political monopoly, structural inequality, weak reintegration systems, unstable interagency coordination, and contested policy choices shape exposure to injury, death, coercion, victimization, and chronic harm. A second contribution concerns definition and measurement. Categories of violence, rules of reporting, agency jurisdiction, and available data are never neutral. Decisions about what counts, who counts, and which harms become visible influence criminal justice practice, research findings, public narratives, and policy agendas. Public health offers a useful framework because measurable harms, exposures, and institutional contact across health, justice, and social service systems can anchor analysis while still recognizing power, politics, and administrative discretion. Together, the manuscripts move beyond event-based and offender-centered explanations. Violence emerges as politically organized harm, patterned by governance and reproduced through institutions.
Dennis et al. (2026) studied this question.