Based on network pharmacology and molecular docking technology, this study investigated the mechanism of action of Chaihu Guizhi Ganjiang Decoction (CGGD) in the treatment of slow transit constipation (STC) combined with depression. The Traditional Chinese Medicine System Pharmacology Database Analysis Platform and BATMAN-TCM databases were utilized to screen the active ingredients and target proteins of CGGD. The keywords “slow transit constipation” and “depression” were used to query the GEO, GeneCards, and OMIM databases to obtain the disease targets; the intersection targets of the TCM formula and the disease were taken to analyze the protein interactions among the target genes, and to construct the protein–protein interaction network diagram and the “drug-ingredient-target-disease” interaction network. Gene Ontology functional enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway were used to analyze the enrichment, and molecular docking was used to further confirm the interactions between core ingredients and key targets. Identified 138 active ingredients, 141 target proteins, and 17,110 disease targets. Analysis yielded 10 core ingredients, including quercetin, kaempferol, wogonin, and baicalein, alongside 10 key targets such as estrogen receptor 1, epidermal growth factor receptor, caspase-3, and B-cell lymphoma-2. Molecular docking studies demonstrated strong binding affinities between core ingredients and key targets. Enrichment analysis identified 440 biological processes and 131 pathways. CGGD primarily intervenes in STC combined with depression through pathways including the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt signaling pathway, the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway, and the apoptosis pathway. Through an integrated network pharmacology approach, this study describes the synergistic effects of multiple ingredients, targets, and pathways of CGGD in the treatment of STC combined with depression.
Zhao et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: