Ceramic mold-making stands at the intersection of artistic heritage and technological innovation, prompting the present study to investigate the technical capabilities of traditional methods versus modern three-dimensional (3D) modeling in ceramic mold manufacturing. The research addresses the core problem of evaluating how each approach meets the demands of contemporary ceramic production in terms of precision, efficiency, cost, and design complexity. Aimed at Comparative The Technical Capabilities of Traditional Methods and 3D modeling in ceramic mold manufacturing. The significance of this work lies in its dual contribution: theoretically enriching the field of ceramic art through a systematic comparative analysis, and practically offering empirical insights that guide artists, artisans, and researchers in selecting the most suitable production techniques. Results reveal that traditional methods excel in reproducing heritage forms with artisanal authenticity but are constrained by longer production times and variable precision dependent on manual skills. In contrast, 3D modeling demonstrates high accuracy, speed, and the ability to realize complex geometries, although it demands substantial initial investment in technology and digital expertise. The study highlights the successful integration of silicone rubber molds as intermediaries bridging digital designs and traditional casting, thus enabling hybrid approaches. Ultimately, the findings advocate for a combined strategy that leverages the precision and efficiency of digital methods while preserving the cultural and aesthetic value intrinsic to traditional craftsmanship. This integrated approach is proposed as the optimal path forward for advancing ceramic mold-making practices in both artistic and industrial contexts.
Soliman et al. (Wed,) studied this question.