This essay examines the relationship between God, the universe, and the present moment through a metaphysical framework centered on dependency, intelligibility, and the distinction between explanation and ground. It argues that contemporary accounts of religion, meaning, and human experience often succeed as sociology while failing to address ontology. Through an analysis of imagination, emergence, the Now, and the distinction between Non Serviam and Non Te Egeo, the essay explores how modernity increasingly replaces rebellion against transcendence with the assumption that transcendence is unnecessary. Against this architecture of sufficiency, it proposes that the fundamental philosophical question remains unchanged: not how reality functions, but why reality exists at all.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Oscar Gaitan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Oscar Gaitan (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a27add2a963992e16267e27 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20584730