Abstract This text explores the ontology of the incarnated human being through a radical and sincere questioning of one’s own existence. The author investigates suffering as a directional vector, the future as a book already written, the afterlife as a dimension that interferes with daily life, and interiority as a possible energetic and shared dimension. The reflection unfolds through intentional repetitions, resonances, and returns, which are not redundancies but the very form of lived ontological inquiry. The result is a morphology of the human being that does not aim to convince but to testify to a personal path that is both individual and ontological. OpenAIRE Description This contribution presents an ontological reflection on the condition of the incarnated human being, developed through a phenomenological and introspective inquiry that does not seek to establish absolute truths but to outline a personal path toward understanding existence. The text addresses themes such as suffering as a regulating principle, the direction of one’s future, the nature of the afterlife, the structure of interiority, and the hypothesis of a shared energetic dimension. The author introduces the concept of a stratified liminal field as a possible connective layer between different levels of being and as a place of resonance between the incarnated self, the energetic self, and consciousness. The work belongs to the fields of human sciences, philosophy of mind, and consciousness studies, offering an original and non‑dogmatic approach. OpenAIRE Description (extended, optimized) This work presents an ontological investigation into the condition of the incarnated human being, approached through a direct, non‑dogmatic, and experiential method. The text examines suffering as a structural regulator of existence, the orientation of the future as a predetermined trajectory, and the afterlife as a dimension that interacts with daily life. The author conceptualizes interiority not as psychological introspection but as a potential energetic dimension shared across individuals, inhabited by non‑physical forms of life and by an “energetic self” active during sleep. The work introduces the notion of a stratified liminal field as a connective layer between different levels of being, enabling resonance‑based communication between the embodied self, the energetic self, and consciousness. The contribution is relevant to ontology, philosophy of mind, consciousness studies, and interdisciplinary approaches to human experience. It provides a personal yet structurally coherent model for understanding the relationship between suffering, direction, interiority, and the afterlife.
Oliva FMOO (Sun,) studied this question.