Public spaces in informal settlements are often viewed as congested, unregulated, or residual areas, yet they play a central role in everyday urban life. This paper examines how public spaces are socially produced through everyday appropriation, interaction, and routine use in two informal settlements in Lahore, Pakistan. Using a qualitative comparative case-study design, the study draws on field observations, semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, activity mapping, photographic documentation, and spatial interpretation. The findings show that streets function as multifunctional public spaces rather than simple movement corridors. They support livelihood activities, children’s play, domestic extension, informal mobility, social gathering, and community visibility. The results also show that public space use varies by gender, age, time of day, and settlement morphology, with everyday practices shaped by the interaction between street layouts, housing forms, public–private thresholds, and local socio-cultural routines. The paper concludes that informal public spaces should not be understood only as signs of disorder or planning failure. They are adaptive socio-spatial systems that support livelihood, belonging, and everyday resilience. Recognizing these resident-led spatial practices can inform more sensitive upgrading approaches that improve physical conditions without erasing the social relations and everyday uses through which public space is produced.
Arif et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: