This technical note develops a structural-regulatory account of identity-continuity in human psychic transformation. It examines the conditions under which psychic material becomes transformable only when the psyche can preserve enough self-recognition, role-continuity, moral orientation, relational intelligibility, and future orientation to undergo change without collapse into discontinuity. The paper distinguishes identity-continuity from rigidity and treats rupture not as transformation, but as a condition in which available forms of change exceed the continuity conditions through which transformation can be admitted. It introduces the distinction between continuity bridges and continuity locks. A continuity bridge allows change to become continuous enough to undergo, while a continuity lock preserves recognizability by keeping material inside the same organization. The note also analyzes role, narrative, and moral continuity; symbolic forms of self-recognition; partial transformation under identity constraints; and the conditions under which continuity either supports or prevents transformation. Its central claim is that psychic transformation requires not only change, but continuity through change. The psyche may resist transformation not because change is impossible, but because the available form of change is not continuous enough to undergo.
Kostiantyn Osmolovskyi (Tue,) studied this question.