Corruption represents one by one of the most serious and multifaceted social, political, and legal challenges for the states (5, 13). It significantly makes it worse for democratic institutions, limits law supremacy principles, and weakens the defense of public governance and hand and prevents economic and social development stability (7, 14). The mentioned phenomenon is perceived not only as one specific country's challenge but also represents a global problem, which effective management requires legal, institutional, and social mechanisms to set (6,20). Article: The goal is corruption against battle legal and institutional mechanisms: a comparative analysis in Georgia and developed countries in practice. Research based on doctrinal, normative, and comparative legal approaches that include international conventions, national legislation, specialized institutions, and fairly executed politics practices (18, 25). Research Basic Conclusions shows that Corruption Against Effective Politics Requires Complexity And Integration The approach that combines: • Preventive mechanisms, between public sector transparency and procurement processes electronization (3.9); •Blood Law Responsibility Corrupt for actions (5, 14); • Institutional Independence Strengthening and Investigative Organs' Professional Efficiency (11,21); • International Cooperation Mechanisms to use Transnational Corruption Against (8,18); • Civil Society, media, and non-governmental organizations' active engagement (17, 20). Research as a result It is confirmed that Georgia's anti-corruption politics and legal framework are possibly significantly strengthened if the state masters developed countries' best practices (3.11) and maintains legal structure and international standards relevant to regulations (18, 25).
Giorgi Kvaratskhelia (2026) studied this question.