Accurate performance prediction for large offshore wind turbines requires a principledtreatment of uncertainty in both the wind resource and the rotor design parameters. In thepresent work, we develop a surrogate-based, multi-level uncertainty quantification (UQ)framework coupling a physics-based Blade Element Momentum (BEM) solver with a spectralPolynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) surrogate that replaces the expensive Monte Carloloop and apply it to the IEA 15 MW offshore reference wind turbine. The framework iscompleted by Sobol variance-based global sensitivity analysis. The contribution is methodologicalrather than algorithmic: although each individual ingredient (PCE, Sobol, BEM,and Jensen) is well established, their joint deployment in a single, internally consistent,end-to-end probabilistic workflow that simultaneously delivers (i) aerodynamic–structuralUQ with analytical Sobol ranking, (ii) a like-for-like cross-comparison of three referenceturbines, (iii) a quantitative leading-edge icing degradation study, and (iv) a farm-levelwake-steering optimization on the same IEA 15 MW reference rotor yields a unified probabilisticenvelope from which manufacturing tolerances, cold-climate investment thresholds,and farm-layout/control trade-offs can be read off consistently. Five input parametersare treated as random variables: hub-height wind speed (Weibull, k = 2.2, c = 9.8 m/s),air density, blade chord length, twist angle, and rotor speed. A degree-4 sparse PCE isbuilt by non-intrusive spectral projection using N = 5000 Sobol quasi-random realizations,which allows the Sobol indices to be recovered analytically from the expansioncoefficients at essentially no extra cost. Three parallel engineering studies complementthe core UQ analysis: (A) a head-to-head comparison of the NREL 5 MW, DTU 10 MW,and IEA 15 MW reference turbines; (B) a quantitative assessment of leading-edge ice accretionat four severity levels; and (C) a Jensen-based wake optimization for a 25-turbineoffshore array with static wake steering. The main results are as follows: the turbine reachesCp,max = 0.480 at λopt = 8.51, and an annual energy production (AEP) of 71,261 MWh/year(PCE: 70,840 ± 2,140 MWh/year, 95% CI). Wind speed emerges as the dominant driverof Cp variance (S1 = 0.412), followed by blade twist (0.198) and chord (0.143). Severeicing (30 kg/m) reduces Cp by 18.2% and increases the blade-root Damage EquivalentLoad (DEL) by 18.5%. For the array, the optimal spacing (sx = 8D, sy = 6D) gives a farmefficiency of 89.6% and 1296 GWh/year, and a 15° wake-steering offset adds a further+3.2% to farm AEP. Compared with plain Monte Carlo, the sparse PCE delivers the samestatistics with about 36% fewer model evaluations and a relative error below 0.8%.
Baghli et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: