Human activity recognition (HAR) using Wi-Fi channel state information (CSI) offers a privacy-preserving and contactless sensing modality suitable for smart homes, healthcare monitoring, and pervasive mobile Internet of Things (IoT) environments. However, existing CSI-based HAR approaches often suffer from computational inefficiency, high latency, and limited feasibility on resource-constrained embedded platforms. This work presents STAR (Sensing Technology for Activity Recognition), an edge AI-optimized framework that integrates lightweight temporal modeling, adaptive signal processing, and hardware-aware co-optimization to enable real-time, energy-efficient HAR on low-power embedded devices. STAR employs a streamlined three-layer Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) architecture that reduces model parameters by 33% compared to conventional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) designs while maintaining strong temporal modeling capability. To enhance signal quality, STAR incorporates a multi-stage pre-processing pipeline consisting of median filtering, an eighth-order Butterworth low-pass filtering, and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) to denoise CSI amplitude measurements and extract stable spatial-temporal features. For on-device deployment, the system is implemented on a Rockchip RV1126 processor equipped with an embedded Neural Processing Unit (NPU) and interfaced with an ESP32-S3 CSI acquisition module. Experimental results demonstrate a mean recognition accuracy of 93.52% across seven activity classes and 99.11% for human-presence detection using a compact 97.6k-parameter model. INT8-quantized inference achieves a processing throughput of 33 MHz with only 8% CPU utilization, achieving a six-fold improvement in inference speed over CPU-based execution. With sub-second response latency and low power consumption, the system ensures real-time, privacy-preserving HAR, offering a practical, scalable solution for mobile and pervasive computing environments.
Liu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: