Abstract Purpose of Review Neuroscientific models of addiction have evolved over the past four decades from single-circuit dopamine frameworks to dual-process, tripartite, and multidimensional accounts. Despite these advances, existing models incompletely account for the lived experience of addiction and for developmental, social, and mental-health factors that contribute to heterogeneity in risk and outcome. This review synthesizes this progression and evaluates the need for more integrative frameworks. Recent Findings Recent work highlights addiction-related alterations in large-scale brain networks and demonstrates that psychosocial and contextual factors play a more central mechanistic role than previously acknowledged. Emerging interventions, including psychedelic-assisted therapies, further underscore the relevance of multilevel change across neurobiological, cognitive, and affective domains. Summary Framing addiction as a multilevel, interactive process within a biopsychosocial framework provides a unifying perspective that accommodates heterogeneity in pathways and outcomes. Integrative models may better inform mechanistic research and guide the development of more precise, clinically meaningful interventions.
Paul S. Regier (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: