Autonomous driving systems face critical perception failures in dense fog, where conventional RGB cameras suffer from severe degradation due to atmospheric scattering and reduced visibility. This paper presents an adaptive multi-modal fusion framework that synergistically integrates gated imaging with 3D LiDAR point clouds to achieve robust obstacle detection under visibility conditions as low as 50 m. Unlike standard cameras that passively capture scattered ambient light, gated cameras employ time-synchronized active illumination to physically filter backscattered photons, preserving structural features even in low-visibility scenarios. We propose a novel Adaptive Feature-Weighting Network (AFW-Net) that dynamically adjusts sensor modality contributions based on real-time environmental degradation assessment. The framework incorporates three key innovations: (1) a cross-modal feature extraction module that exploits the complementary physical properties of gated imaging and LiDAR, (2) an attention-based adaptive fusion mechanism that quantifies per-modality reliability through uncertainty estimation, and (3) a degradation-aware training strategy using weather-specific augmentation. Extensive experiments on the Princeton Automated Driving Dataset demonstrate that our approach maintains detection average precision (AP) above 82% under dense fog conditions (50 m visibility), representing a 23.7% improvement over state-of-the-art RGB-LiDAR fusion methods that exhibit substantial performance degradation to 58.4% AP. Ablation studies validate the necessity of each component, and cross-dataset evaluation confirms the generalization capability of the proposed framework. The adaptive weighting mechanism proves particularly effective, dynamically rebalancing modality contributions across the gated imaging and LiDAR branches while maintaining LiDAR geometric constraints. This work establishes a robust perception paradigm for safety-critical autonomous systems operating in low-visibility environmental conditions.
Zhang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: