For a long time, in our pursuit of a deeper understanding and application of the physical world, we have established an extensive array of physical disciplines. These have achieved remarkable precision in mathematical predictions and proven highly effective in engineering applications. However, it is crucial not to overlook the following emerging vulnerabilities: 1. Diminishing physical intuition in descriptions: Concepts such as operators, probability waves, matrices, fiber bundles, spacetime curvature, dark energy, and dark matter are becoming increasingly abstract. There is a growing lack of a unified physical description that is observable, evolvable, and capable of materialization. 2. Weak compatibility across domains: The logical connections between energy and momentum, spacetime backgrounds and entity evolution, fields and particles, as well as information transmission, perception mechanisms, and entity evolution, remain unresolved. There is a tendency to artificially bridge these gaps rather than fundamentally reconciling them. 3. Lack of microscopic origins for dimensional relationships: The interrelationships among fundamental dimensions—such as time, space, mass, energy, momentum, force, information, and entropy—lack a foundational connection and a unified descriptive framework. 4. Incomplete physical mechanisms: There is an absence of a comprehensive mechanistic chain describing the complete process of a particle, from its generation, origin of motion, causal interactions, and phenomenon emergence, to dimensional relationships, conservation laws, and macroscopic observations.
bo xiao (Thu,) studied this question.