v1. 1 (2026-06-13): typographic and text-layer correction — the PDF is regenerated with a verified Unicode text layer (Σ restored from a font substitution; extraction-hostile font tags removed), and the markdown source is co-deposited as the canonical machine-readable text. Content unchanged from v1. 0. SR108EN is a reference lexicon for Coherence Cosmology. It collects in one place the core terms of Structural Philosophy as developed across the corpus — SR103EN (Coherence Cosmology: the world as a static coherent structure), SR104EN (consciousness, qualia, and identity), and their two formalization notes. The lexicon contains forty entries in nine parts, spanning the foundations of existence and the global coherent structure, the structure of the present and time, mutual recognizability and the correspondence with special relativity, the quantum-mechanical correspondence, apparent inconsistency and the two-layer description, qualia and consciousness, identity, and free will. Each entry gives a prose definition, the formal expression where one is defined (using strict partial orders, antichain sections, and section theory), and a reference to its source. This is an ontological lexicon, not a derivation of physics. It introduces no new results; it makes the established vocabulary explicit and internally consistent. Two commitments run throughout. First, the vocabulary is static: the order relations ≺ and ≺_Σ are crystallized asymmetries within an already-complete whole, not transitions occurring in time, and terms such as “present, ” “collapse, ” and “tendency” never denote a process unfolding in time. Second, where a term corresponds to a feature of special relativity, quantum mechanics, or gravitation, the correspondence is offered as a conceptual bridge — an ontological reinterpretation — not a proof. Existence and coherence are treated as binary; mutual recognizability V is graded but is not a degree of existence; and the identity Q (σ) ≡ σ is treated as an ontological description, neither an axiom nor a derived theorem. Prerequisites: SR103EN v1. 8 (DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20384031) and SR104EN v1. 2 (DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20384331). Related: SR103EN Formalization (DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20405659) and SR104EN Formalization (DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20405676).
Masashi Saito (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: