Abstract In this paper we report the results of laboratory experiments designed to investigate the competing demands that sellers and buyers have for credibility generating mechanisms. These demands are investigated as an initial stage of a research program designed to address some fundamental issues related to the demand for auditing services. The mechanism available to the seller is a "verification" mechanism which can be used to verify the truthfulness of the seller's disclosures about the type of asset held for sale. The mechanism available to the buyers is a report which informs all buyers of the type of asset that the seller has for sale. The results from our market settings show that each of these mechanisms individually increase economic efficiencies (reducing moral hazard and adverse selection problems), particularly when asset realization feedback is delayed to the buyers. But even in settings with delayed realization feedback and credibility mechanisms, efficiency is not achieved to the maximum extent possible.
Dopuch et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: