What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to analyze and fix the concept of 'there-is' within the framework of Kasei-Theory, distinguishing it from traditional notions of existence.

June 17, 2026Open Access

Kasei-Theory Post-II Threshold: There-Is Without Existence

Key Points

The aim is to analyze and fix the concept of 'there-is' within the framework of Kasei-Theory, distinguishing it from traditional notions of existence.
Theoretical exploration of the nature of 'there-is' without recourse to established ontological categories.
Examination of the post-II threshold in Kasei-Theory and its implications for readability and existence.
'There-is' is defined as a readability condition rather than a basis of existence or ontological fulfillment.
The paper establishes boundaries for interpreting 'there-is' without reverting to traditional ontological discourse.
Kasei-Theory suggests that concepts like determinism and necessity are incompatible with the understanding of 'there-is'.

Abstract

This paper fixes there-is within the post-II threshold of Kasei-Theory. There-is is not introduced as existence, being, entity, presence, there-being, ontological positing, existential assertion, givenness, object, referent, reference, truth, world, reality, access, or ontology. Reading does not establish there-is. Time does not establish there-is. Observation does not establish there-is. State does not establish there-is. Field does not establish there-is. Interaction does not establish there-is. Information does not establish there-is. Phase does not establish there-is. Life does not establish there-is. Consciousness does not establish there-is. Qualia do not establish there-is. Askability does not establish there-is. Object does not establish there-is. Reference does not establish there-is. Configuration does not establish there-is. There-is is fixed only as the threshold readability condition under which readable configuration is readable as there-is without establishing existence. This threshold readability does not establish existence, being, entity, presence, there-being, ontological positing, existential assertion, givenness, object, referent, reference, truth, world, reality, access, or ontology. The paper prevents there-is from being reduced to existence, being, entity, presence, existential assertion, ontological positing, givenness, object, referent, reference, truth, world, reality, or ontological ground. There-is does not restore reference, does not supply existence, does not establish being, does not secure entity, does not open ontology, and does not complete the post-II threshold as ontological fulfillment. Kasei-Theory does not establish determinism. Fixation is not determination. Constraint is not necessity. Maintainability is not predestination. Non-transition is not modal exclusion. No existence is presupposed. No being is introduced. No entity is established. No presence is restored. No ontological positing is introduced. No ontology is secured. The post-II threshold closes without ontology.

Read Full Paperexternally

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper