Abstract The employment contract in force today was designed to govern the exchange of time and effort for remuneration. It does not record, price, or even name a transfer that has become central to the knowledge economy: the codification of a professional’s intellectual capital into the firm’s structural and algorithmic assets. I call this uncompensated transfer algorithmic expropriation and distinguish it sharply from technological displacement — it requires no dismissal and operates on the contractual rather than the extensive margin. The purpose of this article is not to propose a fiscal remedy but to draw out two consequences of the phenomenon that have received little systematic attention. First, algorithmic expropriation inverts the map of occupational value: the most codifiable, most “expert” knowledge is the most expropriable, so the occupations long regarded as safe — high-skill analytical professions — turn out to be among the most exposed, while value migrates toward what resists codification (judgment under genuine ambiguity, relational and social skill, cross-domain synthesis, and the supervision and auditing of autonomous systems). Using the open ITEA Framework, an occupational exposure index validated against the AIOE benchmark, I sketch this re-ordering and the new professional profiles it generates. Second, the phenomenon reframes the mission of the education system: an education optimized to transmit codifiable procedural expertise now optimizes, inadvertently, for expropriability. I argue for a reorientation of curricula toward non-expropriable human capital, for a lifelong-learning infrastructure adequate to a shortening skill half-life, and for the university to take on a new role as certifier of traceable intellectual capital. The question of how to compensate the transfer — through tokenized residual rights rather than a Pigouvian tax — is treated in a companion paper and left aside here. Keywords: algorithmic expropriation; intellectual capital; future of work; professional profiles; education reform; lifelong learning; human capital; skill obsolescence; artificial intelligence. JEL: J24, I20, O33, J23, M53.
Alberto García-Lluis Valencia (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: