Higher construction costs (CCs) linked to carbon reduction methods have hindered the adoption of low-carbon approaches in the built environment. The simultaneous minimisation of upfront embodied carbon (EC) and CCs has not received much attention in building design optimisation (BDO) research; most studies prioritise operational energy, operational carbon, and operational cost reduction. This paper develops an integrated conceptual framework for low-carbon, cost-effective BDO, particularly targeting upfront EC and CCs, to fill this research gap and meet industry demands. A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, synthesising 41 peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2026. Thematic and content analyses were employed to extract and categorise key methodological components, including optimisation problem characterisation, objective-driven design variable selection, constraint modelling, algorithm selection, and evaluation and validation approaches. Subsequently, the developed conceptual framework was validated through semi-structured expert interviews with participants comprising BDO researchers and building designers in the construction field. A cross-mapping of optimisation objectives, optimised parameters, and design variables was developed to clarify their interrelationships, alongside structured criteria for optimisation algorithm selection. Based on these insights, a conceptual framework named “ICCO-BD (Integrated Upfront Carbon and Construction Cost Optimisation for Building Design) framework” is proposed and validated, integrating problem formulation, parametric modelling, multi-objective optimisation, and systematic Pareto-based evaluation into a coherent end-to-end workflow, enabling improved time efficiency through reduced redesign iterations, enhanced solution quality via better pareto front exploration, and more robust decision-making through clearer trade-off interpretation. While expert feedback indicated strong conceptual relevance and practical applicability, the framework remains conceptual in nature and requires further empirical verification through real-world case studies and optimisation applications before broader industry implementation.
Piyumra et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: