This article presents a review of the landscape of Open Science development and its relevance to crystallography. As open as possible as closed as necessary is the model for Open Science as commended by the UK and China. Mainland Europe requires compulsory release after 3 years since measurement of raw data. The USA policy situation has fluctuated considerably in recent years. Altogether, this article addresses the International Union of Crystallography's (IUCr) input into these activities. It considers its participation in international scientific and societal organizations, as well as its compliance with the policy recommendations. It considers the practical landscape in which crystallographers work, including their funding agencies, governments, central facilities and universities. This article sets the wider scene before describing how crystallography benchmarks against those under development. The IUCr's Teaching Pamphlets and the Online Dictionary of Crystallography are educational resources fully open to Global South and Global North readers and authors. Crystallography provides a mature, practice-based model of responsible openness that predates and can inform contemporary Open Science policy.
John R. Helliwell (Tue,) studied this question.