ObjectiveThis paper considers early colonial Australian incarceration as a diffuse carceral system encompassing gaols, private dwellings and sites of labour rather than discrete institutional forms. Drawing on existing records and historiography, this paper examines the nature of incarceration practices in early colonial Australia prior to the advent of the asylum.ConclusionsConfinement operated across multiple sites, including gaols, assigned labour settings and private households, where authority was exercised through overlapping legal, medical and domestic arrangements. These were not discrete institutional responses but part of a loosely coordinated system in which surveillance and discipline were embedded in everyday colonial life. This analysis highlights how practices of punishment and care developed in tandem, circulating across sites rather than emerging solely within formal institutions. In doing so, it situates early incarceration within broader dynamics of colonial governance and social regulation.This analysis contributes to psychiatric history by illustrating how early Australian asylums emerged from institutions with penal practices, confirming care narratives and underscoring the enduring entanglement of care and control.
Phil Maude (Mon,) studied this question.