ABSTRACT Background Social and structural determinants of health (SSDH) are key drivers of disparities in cognitive aging and dementia risk, yet their collection in aging and dementia research remains inconsistent. We examined SSDH data collection practices across Canadian longitudinal cohorts of aging and dementia, aiming to identify which SSDH are collected and how they are operationalized. Methods We conducted an environmental scan using three sources: (1) literature databases (Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science), 2) grey literature (e.g., Alzheimer Society of Canada’s website), and 3) key informants. We included Canadian longitudinal cohorts of community-dwelling older adults that assessed at least one cognitive or dementia-related outcome, including seven key cohorts previously identified by our group. For each study, we extracted information from data collection instruments on whether specific SSDH were assessed, and which tools were used. Results From 1,043 non-duplicated articles identified through database searches, fourteen unique cohorts met inclusion criteria, eleven of which provided data collection instruments. Five additional cohorts were identified from other sources, and together with 7 pre-identified key cohorts, yielded 23 included cohorts. Disability-related measures and ethnicity- and culture-related constructs were among the most comprehensively assessed domains, whereas literacy, environmental context, and economic conditions were among the least frequently assessed. Conclusion SSDH that shape dementia risk and brain resilience, many modifiable at the community and policy levels, remain unevenly collected in Canadian aging and dementia cohorts. Strengthening and harmonizing SSDH measurement is a critical step toward equitable dementia prevention and reducing health disparities.
Tremblay et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: