This essay examines feminist arguments that frame rest as resistance to capitalist regimes that produce structural burnout. Drawing on a case study of a feminist organization in Vietnam, it explores how the meaning of rest shifts when operating within a context of state-aligned governance. Unlike environments characterized by urgency, the organization studied functioned through an administrative rhythm of regular hours and a formal commitment to work-life balance. In politically constrained environments, rest does not necessarily function as resistance. Instead, it becomes part of a strategy through which organizations secure institutional survival while remaining politically legible to state authorities. This produces continuous self-censorship, as activists calibrate how sensitive issues are articulated to maintain that legibility. Consequently, exhaustion is displaced from physical overwork to the cognitive labor of navigating political limits and from professional staff to marginalized actors outside formal structures. To conceptualize this, the essay introduces “soft governance,” defined as institutional arrangements that incorporate care and rest while subtly regulating the boundaries of acceptable political action. Here, institutionalized rest can function as a mechanism to stabilize existing political arrangements by diffusing pressures that might produce rupture. In response, it also proposes the cultivation of “fugitive spaces”: informal, unrecorded networks of solidarity that sustain critical imagination. Ultimately, the essay calls for a decolonial approach that interrogates the political conditions under which rest becomes possible. Rest is resistant only when it disrupts the regime that authorizes it. This invites scholars to question how managed rest may function as an infrastructure of governance.
Vi Khanh Dao (Wed,) studied this question.