This research paper explores the concept of hamartia (tragic flaw) in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, with particular focus on how the protagonist’s excessive reflection, moral uncertainty, and indecision contribute to his tragic downfall. Drawing upon Aristotle’s theory of tragedy as explained in Poetics, the study examines the transformation of the classical idea of hamartia into a complex psychological condition in Shakespeare’s work. The paper analyses Hamlet’s delay in avenging his father’s murder, his inner conflicts, and the broader consequences of his inaction. It also incorporates critical perspectives from scholars such as A.C. Bradley, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and Harold Bloom to present multiple interpretations of Hamlet’s character. The study argues that Hamlet’s tragic flaw lies not in weakness or cowardice but in an excess of intellectual reflection that prevents decisive action. Ultimately, the paper highlights the universal relevance of Hamlet’s hamartia, showing how it reflects the timeless human struggle between thought and action.
Javed et al. (Fri,) studied this question.