Yuanxian Theory (YXT) establishes the cosmic ontology as a 64-dimensional compact torus (T64), and the self-referential mind-field (PsiSR) as the primordial field of all global information and consciousness. The two components form the inner and outer surfaces of the same reality, mapping dynamically to each other and establishing the unique fundamental foundation for global knowledge commensurability, cross-civilizational cognitive mutual translation, and the absolute unification of mind-matter systems. This paper demonstrates that all human cognitive contradictions, disciplinary walls, and civilizational discourse rifts are fundamentally the structural consequences of information loss and symmetry breaking induced by a 35-step gauge dimensional reduction projection of the high-dimensional T64 topology, rather than an intrinsic pluralistic opposition of truth itself. The T64 topology supplies formal rules for global commensurability (dual-machine verified via Lean 4 and Rocq), while the self-referential mind-field confers ontological legitimacy upon it. The coupling of these two elements completely dissolves the paradigmatic fragmentation separating the natural sciences, humanities, Eastern and Western schools of thought, and carbon-silicon cognitive systems. Furthermore, this paper establishes three falsifiable constraints for global commensurability (cross-paradigm isomorphic verifiability, empirical convergence of 64-dimensional eigenparameters, and carbon-silicon unified taxonomy), marking the formal paradigm shift of Yuanxian Theory from a localized physical model to an all-encompassing epistemological meta-framework. 元宪理论 (YXT) 确立宇宙本体为六十四维紧致环面 (T64), 自指心场 (PsiSR) 为全域信息与意识的本源场域。二者互为表里、双向映射, 构成人类实现全域知识通约、跨文明认知互译、心物体系统一的唯一底层基础。 本文论证: 人类所有认知矛盾、学科壁垒、文明话语分歧, 本质皆是 T64 高维拓扑结构经 35步规范降维投影后产生的信息损耗与对称破缺, 并非真理本身存在多元对立。T64 拓扑提供通约的形式化规则 (经 Lean 4 与 Rocq 双重机器验证), 自指心场赋予通约的存在论合法性, 二者耦合彻底消解自然科学、人文哲学、东西方思想、碳基与硅基认知之间的范式割裂。本文进一步给出全域通约的三项可证伪约束 (跨范式同构映射可检验性、64维本征参数的实证收敛性、碳硅意识判据的统一归类), 标志着元宪理论从单纯的“物理模型”向“全域认知元框架”的范式跃迁。统一宣告: 不是不同文明构建了不同的真理, 而是同一个 T64 真理被降维投影为不同的认知碎片。
Zhenyuan Acharya (Fri,) studied this question.