This article presents a critical-propositional analysis of Felipe Diniz Lima et al.’s State of the Art of Quantum Computing: Overview (2023), published on Zenodo under DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10051347, in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines the article’s treatment of quantum computing, qubits, superposition, wave function, probability, interference, measurement, and information processing, interpreting these themes through the modal, phenomenic, and informational categories of TO. The analysis argues that quantum computing offers an indirect but fertile field of dialogue with TO, especially because it depends on boundary, difference, relation, recursive composition, observation, and the conversion of physical states into operational information. The article does not constitute a direct confirmation of TO’s cosmological or cosmogonic claims, but it provides a valuable technological and philosophical case for discussing informational transcendence, phenomenic determination, and the objective production of knowledge from microscopic physical relations. The text also identifies methodological limitations in the experimental comparison presented by Diniz Lima et al., especially regarding the distinction between real quantum hardware, simulators, cloud execution, and genuinely quantum algorithms. Even so, it concludes that the analyzed article is relevant as an indirect dialogue with TO in the field of quantum information and contemporary computational physics. This analytical study was prepared with analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; quantum computing; qubits; superposition; wave function; quantum information; informational transcendence; phenomenic determination; boundary; observation; modal ontology; Inducer Effects; philosophy of physics; computational physics; ChatGPT.
Cabannas et al. (Sat,) studied this question.