BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is preventable and treatable, yet it remains the leading infectious cause of illness and death among under-five children. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) offers a promising option for oxygen therapy combined with appropriate antibiotics and other supportive care. However, the cost-effectiveness of bCPAP in resource-limited settings such as Ethiopia is not documented. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bCPAP in treating severe pneumonia and hypoxaemia in under-five children in Ethiopia. METHODS: We developed a decision-analytical model (decision tree) to determine the cost-effectiveness of a locally made bCPAP compared with the standard of care (WHO-recommended low-flow oxygen therapy) in general hospitals. Effectiveness was measured as the number of child deaths and disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted. Cost data were extracted from published literature and local markets. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated and evaluated against the willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds set at multiples (0.34, 1, and 3) of Ethiopia's GDP per capita. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: For every 10,000 children with severe pneumonia and hypoxaemia, providing oxygen using locally made bCPAP will save an additional 31 children compared to the standard of care. A locally made bCPAP has an ICER of 139.5 USD per DALY averted. These results were robust in the sensitivity analysis performed, showing a 100% probability of being cost-effective at one times the GDP per capita of Ethiopia. CONCLUSION: A locally made bCPAP is a highly cost-effective intervention for treating severe pneumonia and hypoxaemia in under-five children in Ethiopian general hospitals. These findings provide critical evidence for decision-makers to support and scale-up use of bCPAP in Ethiopia and other similar low and middle income countries.
Negasa et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: