This brief communication provides a novel perspective on the evolving use of dermal fillers by examining the intersection between evidence-based clinical practice, patient perception and decision-making in contemporary aesthetic medicine.As demand for minimally invasive cosmetic procedures continues to increase, clinicians must address not only treatment efficacy and safety but also the psychosocial factors that influence patient expectations and choices.Patient perceptions of risk and benefit are increasingly shaped by social media, cultural beauty ideals, peer experiences and individual motivations.All of which can impact understanding of treatment outcomes and potential complications.Effective risk communication therefore plays a central role in supporting informed consent, managing expectations and creating trust between the patient and practitioner.With use of a case study, this case report illustrates the importance of transparent discussions regarding treatment limitations and realistic outcomes.It also considers the challenges that practitioners face in addressing misinformation and balancing patient desires with evidence-based recommendations.It provides a step-by-step consultation protocol designed to alleviate patient anxiety and prevent unnecessary corrective procedures.By integrating clinical evidence with an understanding of patient psychology and communication strategies, this short report advocates for a more holistic and patient-centred approach to dermal filler practice.Greater emphasis on education, shared decisionmaking and evidence-informed communication may enhance patient satisfaction, promote safer treatment choices and support ethical standards within the rapidly expanding field of aesthetic medicine.
Prager et al. (Mon,) studied this question.