The Rāmāyaṇa and Mahābhārata have long been read as theological landmarks, but a feminist historiographical lens reveals them as something far more unsettling: archives of female experience that oscillate between reverence and erasure. This paper argues that women in these epics are not passive ornaments in a patriarchal tableau but active moral agents whose voices, choices, and suffering exposed the contradictions at the heart of Vedic social order. Moving beyond descriptive enumeration of characters, the article employs a close-reading methodology grounded in textual evidence, comparative gender studies, and subaltern historiography to interrogate how economic dependency coexisted with political influence, how social virtue operated as both armour and prison, and how women’s transgressions were simultaneously feared and narrativized as catalysts for cosmic events. Through the lives of Draupadi, Gandhari, Kuntī, Sītā, Kaikeyī, Mandodarī, Amba, and AhaĻyā, the paper reconstructs a nuanced picture of womanhood that resists binary interpretations of victimhood or empowerment. The central thesis holds that the epics did not merely mirror their societies—they actively negotiated what women could be, and in doing so, left a record that modern scholarship has only begun to read honestly.
Shweta Singh (Mon,) studied this question.