The intersection of state power and literary dissent in the early Turkish Republic provides a critical context for understanding how modern nation-states manage intellectual opposition. Prevailing historiography often compartmentalizes the prominent socialist-realist writer Sabahattin Ali’s career into disconnected traditionalist and secular Marxist phases. Challenging this assumption of linear rupture, this study synthesizes genetic criticism, James C. Scott’s theory of hidden transcripts, and Lev Loseff’s concept of Aesopian language to reveal Ali’s underlying epistemological continuity. Examining an expanded corpus—including early poetry, coerced carceral revisions, private correspondence, and socio-realist prose—the analysis demonstrates that his early literary formation became a vital repertoire for negotiating state coercion. Findings show he strategically deployed the Sufi Ottoman zâhir-bâtın (external form versus inner essence) paradigm to camouflage Marxist commitments beneath a performative public transcript of nationalist compliance. Concurrently, he repurposed a transitional polysemic lexicon—navigating Sufi technical usage, classical literary inheritance, and broader Ottoman–Turkish colloquialisms—to articulate secular, revolutionary awakenings. Ultimately, while authoritarian coercion exacts a superficial public transcript of conformity, the hidden transcript of intellectual autonomy remains highly resilient, utilizing traditional theological frameworks for modern political evasion.
Engin Keflioğlu (Mon,) studied this question.