Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was initially conceived as a minimally invasive surrogate for interrogating cancer biology; however, three decades of evidence have demonstrated that plasma is not a passive reservoir of tumor-derived material, but rather a dynamic and biologically heterogeneous milieu in which multiple competing genomic signals coexist. This review explores the level of interpretive rigor required to translate ctDNA detection into clinically actionable precision oncology. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is discussed not as an occasional confounder, but as an intrinsic source of biological background noise, underscoring the critical importance of matched leukocyte sequencing to discriminate tumor-derived alterations from hematopoietic variants, particularly in older individuals and in patients previously exposed to cytotoxic therapies. The widespread assumption that variant allele frequency (VAF) directly reflects tumor burden is critically re-evaluated through the mathematical relationships linking VAF to tumor fraction, local copy-number architecture, and mutation multiplicity. Within this framework, estimation of cancer cell fraction (CCF) and probabilistic discrimination between clonal and subclonal events are examined, including the emergence of reversion mutations as molecular evidence of therapy-driven evolutionary adaptation. The review also addresses the central paradox of ultra-sensitive sequencing technologies: although unique molecular identifiers and duplex sequencing can extend analytical sensitivity below 0.01% VAF, sensitivity in the absence of contextual specificity risks conflating technical artifacts and biologically insignificant alterations with clinically meaningful disease. Equal emphasis is placed on pre-analytical variables, highlighting how sample collection, stabilization, and processing protocols define the upper limit of downstream analytical reliability. Beyond single-nucleotide variants, fragmentomic and methylation-based approaches are presented as complementary orthogonal dimensions capable of revealing tumor-associated signals even when mutational evidence is limited or absent. Longitudinal ctDNA assessment is argued to provide substantially greater biological and clinical insight than isolated static measurements, while robust clinical reporting is shown to depend on transparent disclosure of assay limitations, residual uncertainty related to CHIP, and structured bidirectional communication between molecular laboratories and treating clinicians. Ultimately, the transition from a biomarker-centered model toward an integrated systems-based framework, combining genomics, epigenomics, fragmentomics, and evolutionary modeling, emerges as the defining challenge for the next generation of liquid biopsy in precision oncology.
Chetta et al. (Tue,) studied this question.