What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to understand how foreign direct investment influences domestic investment across different economies.

July 4, 2026Open Access

The impact of foreign direct investment on domestic investment: evidence from developed and developing economies

Key Points

This research aims to understand how foreign direct investment influences domestic investment across different economies.
Analyzed a panel dataset from 2011 to 2022 encompassing developed and developing economies.
Employed Dynamic Fixed Effect Panel ARDL and error correction models for long- and short-run effects analysis.
Conducted Pedroni and Kao cointegration tests to establish the relationship among variables.
A 1% increase in foreign direct investment reduces domestic investment in developing economies by 0.05%.
A 1% increase in economic growth leads to a 3.8% increase in domestic investment, while a 1% increase in institutional quality results in a 0.5% increase.
Technology transfer positively impacts domestic investment in both developed and developing economies.

Abstract

Abstract Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a global catalyst for economic growth. However, its effects, particularly on domestic investment (DI), have been inconclusive. This study examines the impact of FDI on DI using a panel dataset from 2011 to 2022 across countries from developed and developing economies, employing a Dynamic Fixed Effect Panel ARDL to assess the long- and short-run effects with error correction models (ECMs) for short-term and long-run equilibrium robustness. Cointegration among variables is established using the Pedroni and Kao cointegration tests. Past DI significantly influences current investment decisions in both economies, while in developing economies, FDI has a substantial negative long-term effect, such that a 1% increase in FDI inflows reduces DI by 0.05%, whereas economic growth and institutional quality also have significant positive long-term effects, with a 1% increase in these variables raising DI by 3.8% and 0.5%, respectively, holding other factors constant. Technology transfer shows an immediate complementary effect to DI in both economies. The impact of FDI on DI is highly context-dependent, with divergent outcomes attributable to structural and institutional factors. Policy should treat FDI as a conditional catalyst, not a substitute for DI. Governments need to tightly align FDI attraction with DI promotion, institutional reforms, and proactive technology transfer policies to counteract the mild long-run effect on DI, while harnessing the substantial gains for growth and institutional quality.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper