Ultra-low dose continuous spinal anesthesia provided exceptional hemodynamic stability without vasopressors in a high-risk 78-year-old man undergoing revision hip arthroplasty.
Case Report (n=1)
Does ultra-low dose continuous spinal anesthesia with levobupivacaine maintain hemodynamic stability in a high cardiovascular risk patient undergoing major orthopedic surgery?
Ultra-low dose continuous spinal anesthesia may be a safe and effective option for maintaining hemodynamic stability in high cardiovascular risk orthogeriatric patients undergoing major surgery.
ABSTRACT We present the case of a 78-year-old man (ASA III), with chronic ischemic heart disease, moderate aortic stenosis, hypertension, diabetes, and renal failure undergoing a second revision hip arthroplasty. Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) was performed using an ultra-low dose of 6.25 mg 0.25% isobaric levobupivacaine (3.75 mg + 2.5 mg) without adjuvants, preserving the possibility of incremental dosing if necessary. Intraoperative monitoring documented exceptional hemodynamic stability throughout the entire procedure (180 min), with mean arterial pressure maintained between 75 and 84 mmHg and heart rate between 63 and 70 bpm, without requiring vasopressors. The sensory block (T10) and motor block (Bromage 3) were adequate and regressed to Bromage 0 by the end of the procedure. The patient remained spontaneously breathing room air with an SpO 2 >98%. The presented case demonstrates that ultra-low dose CSA may represent a valuable option for reducing the perioperative risk in carefully selected high-risk orthogeriatric patients.
Tasso et al. (Wed,) conducted a case report in Second revision hip arthroplasty in a high cardiovascular risk patient (n=1). Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) was evaluated on Hemodynamic stability and adequacy of sensory and motor block. Ultra-low dose continuous spinal anesthesia provided exceptional hemodynamic stability without vasopressors in a high-risk 78-year-old man undergoing revision hip arthroplasty.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: